SerbiaWARCRIMESICJ #81 INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUST...

A selection of texts from http://www.icj-cij.org/ Revi.sio/7 1 1 0 ~ ' puts it (see e.g.: p. 10, para. 7 and 8 or p. 26, para. 19) of these "uiicei-tainties", Yugoslavia .firinly maintained, uiltil very receiltly that it was the oniy "contiiluator" of the lbrmer SFRY - an opinion that Bosnia was iiot less coiisequeilt iii cliallei��i~g. Revision itself: "The postulate of continuity was conAs stated il1 the A~~plicutiorz,fbr 4.2 sistently iilaintaiiled and reiterated by the former Goverriment of the FRY" (p. 6, para. 5 ; see also p. 4, para. 4 or pp. 24-25, para. 18), while "[tllie FRY'S claim to coiitinuity was consisteiitly denied by other successor States of the foriller SFRY" (ihid., p. 7, para. 6). In the present proceedings, the Claimant now declares tllat "[alfter the FRY was adinitted as a ilew Member ail 1 Nove~nber 2000, the dilemlilas